Comments on: Ruby on Rails Order by Associated Model http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/ Development with Flex, Ruby, Java, and More... Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:15:58 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Andreas http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/comment-page-1/#comment-255 Andreas Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:35:24 +0000 http://blog.vixiom.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/#comment-255 Thanks a bunch! I've totally missed the necessity of ":include". I was trying for hours to sort directly via an associated table entry without any luck. You really saved my day (night)! Thanks a bunch! I’ve totally missed the necessity of “:include”. I was trying for hours to sort directly via an associated table entry without any luck. You really saved my day (night)!

]]> By: Ruby on Rails Order by Associated Model « Neokain on Train http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/comment-page-1/#comment-254 Ruby on Rails Order by Associated Model « Neokain on Train Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:56:43 +0000 http://blog.vixiom.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/#comment-254 [...] ที่มา: http://blog.vixiom.com/ [...] [...] ที่มา: http://blog.vixiom.com/ [...]

]]> By: Meekish http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/comment-page-1/#comment-253 Meekish Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:10:12 +0000 http://blog.vixiom.com/2006/09/27/ruby-on-rails-order-by-associated-model/#comment-253 Hey, that's cool. I thought ordering could only be done with SQL. Hey, that’s cool. I thought ordering could only be done with SQL.

]]>