<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google Analytics Mixes up Flash and Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/</link>
	<description>Let us toast your non-idiocy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:41:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KreeK</title>
		<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>KreeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vixiom.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>If you have multiple flash components embeded on a HTML page then yes I would use ajax as a hub/queue for data transfer. If you want two seperate flash components to talk to each other you can use flash&#039;s &#039;ExternalInterface&#039; to send data down to JavaScript which would then pass the data to the other flash movie again with ExternalInterface http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_15683

If you don&#039;t need flash to talk to the page Flash Remoting or Flash&#039;s built in XML commands are a better bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have multiple flash components embeded on a HTML page then yes I would use ajax as a hub/queue for data transfer. If you want two seperate flash components to talk to each other you can use flash&#8217;s &#8216;ExternalInterface&#8217; to send data down to JavaScript which would then pass the data to the other flash movie again with ExternalInterface <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_15683" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_15683</a></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t need flash to talk to the page Flash Remoting or Flash&#8217;s built in XML commands are a better bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vixiom.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Can you give more explanations on your observation?
Is that because you have ajax as a centralized hub for data communication or ajax itself talks faster? Is there a way for flash component to communicate with each other? thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you give more explanations on your observation?<br />
Is that because you have ajax as a centralized hub for data communication or ajax itself talks faster? Is there a way for flash component to communicate with each other? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KreeK</title>
		<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>KreeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vixiom.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Yes that was a bit of  blanket statement.

In this case Ajax is the best way to send data back and forth because there are multiple Flash components on a page. I&#039;ve had cases where I had three or more Flash components on a page that tried to load data all at once and it was quicker to get the data via Ajax and have it passed to the components. That said 99% of the time I use Flash Remoting or XML straight to Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that was a bit of  blanket statement.</p>
<p>In this case Ajax is the best way to send data back and forth because there are multiple Flash components on a page. I&#8217;ve had cases where I had three or more Flash components on a page that tried to load data all at once and it was quicker to get the data via Ajax and have it passed to the components. That said 99% of the time I use Flash Remoting or XML straight to Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topfunky</title>
		<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>topfunky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vixiom.com/2007/05/11/new-google-analytics-mixes-up-flash-and-ajax/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about your assertion that Ajax is better than Flash as the &quot;data workhorse.&quot; Flash is also capable of transferring data remotely to a server and has good XML features. Why do you think that Ajax (Javascript) is better for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about your assertion that Ajax is better than Flash as the &#8220;data workhorse.&#8221; Flash is also capable of transferring data remotely to a server and has good XML features. Why do you think that Ajax (Javascript) is better for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

