<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Compares Flex and Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2008/02/06/adobe-compares-flex-and-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2008/02/06/adobe-compares-flex-and-ajax/</link>
	<description>Let us toast your non-idiocy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:41:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rey Bango</title>
		<link>http://blog.alastairdawson.com/2008/02/06/adobe-compares-flex-and-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey Bango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vixiom.com/2008/02/06/adobe-compares-flex-and-ajax/#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Well to clarify some things, Brian Rinaldi isn&#039;t an employee of Adobe. He wrote this piece for the Adobe Edge online magazine so this isn&#039;t Adobe&#039;s stance. Brian&#039;s a sharp guy and has some good points in his posting as there are specific instances where one technology is better suited than the other. You can see his blog here: http://www.remotesynthesis.com/blog/index.cfm/2008/2/6/Comparing-Adobe-Flex-and-Ajax-Development-Models

As for ColdFusion, well it&#039;s obvious you&#039;re not in tune with the CF community and the breadth of features included in CF8. It appeared to be a shrinking market for awhile but as of the latest release has seen quite a bit of resurgence in use. So don&#039;t be so quick to dismiss it. Also, if a person can&#039;t read and understand CFML, then there&#039;s a serious lack of skills someplace as it&#039;s as straightforward as any language out there.

Finally, the reason that Brian&#039;s article uses CF is because he&#039;s a CF expert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to clarify some things, Brian Rinaldi isn&#8217;t an employee of Adobe. He wrote this piece for the Adobe Edge online magazine so this isn&#8217;t Adobe&#8217;s stance. Brian&#8217;s a sharp guy and has some good points in his posting as there are specific instances where one technology is better suited than the other. You can see his blog here: <a href="http://www.remotesynthesis.com/blog/index.cfm/2008/2/6/Comparing-Adobe-Flex-and-Ajax-Development-Models" rel="nofollow">http://www.remotesynthesis.com/blog/index.cfm/2008/2/6/Comparing-Adobe-Flex-and-Ajax-Development-Models</a></p>
<p>As for ColdFusion, well it&#8217;s obvious you&#8217;re not in tune with the CF community and the breadth of features included in CF8. It appeared to be a shrinking market for awhile but as of the latest release has seen quite a bit of resurgence in use. So don&#8217;t be so quick to dismiss it. Also, if a person can&#8217;t read and understand CFML, then there&#8217;s a serious lack of skills someplace as it&#8217;s as straightforward as any language out there.</p>
<p>Finally, the reason that Brian&#8217;s article uses CF is because he&#8217;s a CF expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

